We're so pleased to announce our educational distribution deal with Outcast Films! Get in touch with them at firstname.lastname@example.org to partner with us on our educational tour.
Our next stops are:
1) Friday, April 22, 5-8pm, at the Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C. Our Director Vanessa Hope will be in conversation with our subjects Chen Guangcheng and Jon Huntsman after the screening. For more info and to register for the event: http://iprcua.com/2016/03/22/all-eyes-and-ears-jon...
2) Tuesday, April 26 at UC Berkeley, Director Vanessa Hope will answer questions after the screening.
Visit our Screenings page for more information on these and all future screenings.
We're back on the road again with a great line-up of fall and winter festivals!
By "we" I mean our film team which includes many terrific people like Magela Crosignani, Laura Hudock, Daron Murphy, Geralyn White Dreyfous, Ted Hope, Doug Blush, Michael Taylor, Fred Koschmann, Jean Tsien, Paul Frost, and more here: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2505376/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1In the process of making this film, Ted and I moved 3 times from NY to SF to LA and found wonderful new team members everywhere we went.
ALL EYES AND EARS seeks to illuminate the delicate, intersecting layers of history, ideology and politics at play behind current diplomatic maneuvers in the US relationship with China. It was a gift to be able to investigate and explore these issues of how and why we prioritize security, economics or human rights and in such a systemic way examining the decades since Nixon and Kissinger’s normalization of the relationship.
In the middle of a U.S. presidential campaign year, we’re acutely aware of the tremendous cynicism and disillusionment American citizens have toward their government. Cynicism and disillusionment toward government exists in China too of course. For those on the frontlines of the relationship however, like U.S. Ambassador to China Jon Huntsman, his adopted Chinese daughter, Gracie Mei, and blind legal advocate Chen Guangcheng not finding purpose, identity and resolve amid the two nations’ evolving relationship is not an option.
Ambassador Huntsman after his time in China contending with achieving diplomatic goals in balance with the two countries’ interests in national security and economic growth, makes a run for president, demonstrating the importance of "getting our own house in order" if we want to emphasize the value and necessity of human rights and democracy on a global scale. Teenager Gracie gathers a more intimate understanding of her own cross-cultural identity and voice in this complex foreign policy driven world. Meanwhile, Chen Guangcheng’s journey — from being under house arrest to his highly publicized asylum at the U.S. Embassy — highlights the legal advocate's thoughts on China’s ambitions as an emergent world power and symbolizes where the countries’ priorities lie.
I wanted to investigate the interaction of the US and China’s political systems and show their systemic patterns from the perspective of the top and the bottom in both societies. The more awareness and support on the ground in either country there is, the better politicians can do their jobs.
I believe in diplomacy and the importance of the long-term goals the relationship seeks to achieve, but I question whether our current strategies will get us there. By giving voice, identity and prominence to those like Chen Guangcheng on the ground in China in a story about US foreign policy and politics normally confined to white men of power, I hope to improve our understanding of the situation and its truths for the peoples of both countries and the many other countries in the world this relationship impacts.
I hope to encourage others to be a vital part of the debate particularly in giving voice to the voiceless and courage to those who live in fear. This year, on Gloria Steinem’s recommendation, I read two books by Valerie Hudson, “Sex and World Peace” (2012) and “The Hillary Doctrine” (2015). I’ve just come from a conference organized by Dr. Hudson about “Women in Foreign Policy.” It turns out that my feminist instinct to give Gracie Huntsman a voice in the film has merit not only because it might encourage more of the female population to enter the field of foreign policy and politics, but also because it demonstrates the value of a female perspective in general. There is a paradigm shift taking place in foreign policy thinking globally that the US needs to be at the forefront of promoting: an inclusive definition of national security that doesn’t silo “women’s issues,” but instead takes account of women’s insecurity (ie subjugation, threat of physical violence, domestic violence, sexual assault, lack of rights to an education etc,) as its number one priority and lens through which to view the state of the world.
Improving our foreign policy with China will require listening to more Chinese people who are on the ground in China and not in government, like Chen Guangcheng, a huge champion of women's rights who fought to improve women's lives in China, and including and listening to more women’s voices at the tables of decision making.
I shot the majority of this film in China with one DP, Magela Crosignani, over the course of a four year longitudinal study with multiple trips back and forth. We were running and gunning (sometimes up and down steep steps of the temples in Lhasa, Tibet), Magela carrying the SONY EX3 on her shoulder without anyone to help her but me and the most I could do was have her back and stop her from falling. We were followed. We were harassed. We were blocked from filming many times. We were “leaned on” as Michael Keaton playing Boston Globe reporter Robby Robinson puts it in the new film SPOTLIGHT by Tom McCarthy which is a must see.
Many people would’ve preferred this story not come out because it doesn’t pull its punches about what’s actually happening in the relationship and in both countries and might reach a more broad audience than whose who see China only through the lens of how to profit from it and pretend that problems don't exist on both sides. But we persevered. I kept an open mind throughout and learned a great deal in the process not just about filmmaking, but about how to make the complex issues of this story less intimidating to audiences, how to prove their continuing relevance and universal applicability today and how to point toward what may lie in our future if we don't start paying attention to what's happening now.
- Vanessa Hope
A great review of Chen Guangcheng’s Barefoot Lawyer in the New York Review of Books that considers how Chen’s story relates to that of China as a whole—which is exactly how Chen fits into our film too.
"A Blind Lawyer vs. Blind Chinese Power"
Evan Osnos JULY 9, 2015 ISSUE
In early 2012, Chen Guangcheng, a self-taught lawyer who had been blind since infancy, lived with his wife and two children in the village of Dongshigu, where he’d been raised, on the eastern edge of the North China plain. They were not there by choice. For a little over a decade, Chen had waged a public campaign against corruption, pollution, forced abortion, and other abuses of power. Officials had responded with escalating punishments. After he completed a four-year jail sentence on a charge of “obstructing traffic,” Chen and his family were confined to his ancestral home in a form of undeclared and indefinite house arrest. The local government covered the windows with metal sheeting and stationed guards around the building. Phones, computers, and televisions were forbidden. When one of Chen’s brothers died, Chen was permitted to send only his seven-year-old daughter to mourn him. To send back a message, another brother resorted to whispering to the daughter while they knelt beside the grave.
In early 2011 Chen and his wife, Yuan Weijing, made a video pleading for help that was smuggled out of China; afterward, guards beat Yuan, breaking her ribs. A year later, when guards roughed up his mother, who was seventy-seven, Chen reached a decision—“my anger congealed into a kind of desperate resolve,” he writes in The Barefoot Lawyer, a fierce memoir of rural life and dissent. “I would escape, or try to escape, and I would do it soon.” The architect of his jailbreak would be his wife. For weeks, she visited their roof, pretending to be drying corn or hanging laundry; she was mapping out each footstep that he would take to climb into an adjoining yard. She cleared the leaves that would crackle underfoot, she counted the walls that he would scale, and she monitored the habits of the guards. Finally, she studied the lunar calendar for a chengri—an auspicious day: April 20.
At night the village was too quiet for an escape; Chen could hear the beeping of the guards’ cell phones as they played games. So he departed in daylight: over the roof, creeping from backyard to backyard, hiding for hours in a goat pen while his wife and daughter carried on a charade of normalcy. For nearly four decades, Chen had navigated his way in the village without sight, using, as he puts it, “the patterns of sounds, the mix of smells, the organization of space.” He could estimate the time by noting which village roosters cried at which hour of the day. He had a system for avoiding obstacles without use of a cane:
By making just the slightest shhhh sound, no louder than a light wind in a pine tree, I could determine from the returning sound waves what was in front of me, whether large object or wall, forest or field.
Chen’s book includes occasional italicized passages written from his wife’s perspective, and the portrait emerges of a full and formidable partner in Chen’s life. Of her husband’s escape, she writes:
I usually don’t believe in luck or God or any higher power, but on that day I believed in anything that might help us. As the afternoon went on, I returned to the kitchen several times to pray to the image of the Kitchen God on the wall. By the following evening, Chen was out of his village and en route to Beijing, where he sought refuge in the US embassy, setting off one of the most unusual crises in diplomatic history. He and his family later settled in America.
I lived in China from 2005 to 2013 and watched Chen emerge as an activist. We spoke occasionally by phone and I wrote about his activities. For all of his audacity, and the sheer physical improbability of his story, I always regarded his experience as that of an outlier, with limited lessons for understanding China’s future. But The Barefoot Lawyercompels us to consider an alternative reading. The details of how, exactly, a man who might never have left the village of his birth came to see the need to confront the Chinese state says much about him but no less about his country. Chen may turn out to be less of an aberration in the political forces shaping modern China than an embodiment of them.
When Chen was born in November 1971, his family was very poor, which is to say, no more or less poor than their neighbors in rural Shandong province. His father’s family had survived the famine following the Great Leap Forward, partly by eating bark and grass. Chen, the youngest of five sons, was known as Little Five. (As a teenager, he chose the given name Cheng, meaning “sincere.”) When he was five months old he developed a fever but the family lacked the two yuan needed to visit a hospital. The Cultural Revolution was raging and China’s economy was a wreck. After the infant cried non-stop for two days, his mother found blue masses on his eyes. “Sometimes I like to say that I was blinded by communism—or, more specifically, a wave of unrealistic, empty propaganda that swept the country continually for decades,” Chen writes. For years, the family searched for a diagnosis or a treatment—one doctor said it was keratitis, another said glaucoma—but they never found an answer.
The Barefoot Lawyer opens with a brisk account of Chen’s escape and then goes back in time to describe his path to activism. For many reasons, it was not an easy book to produce. In conversation, Chen, who speaks little English, makes esoteric references to Chinese literature and philosophy. For this project he had the help of collaborators, including his wife, their translator, their editor, and two unnamed writers, and the result is a highly readable and disciplined narrative of a life unto itself. He goes a long way toward answering the questions that have puzzled many who have followed the story of Chen’s life: Why did he take the risk? How did he come to believe that he should, and could, be a legal activist? What, in the end, was he seeking?
In Chen’s telling, his politics emerged from a combustible mix of deprivation and opportunity. Chen’s parents, like many in their generation in China, wanted nothing to do with questioning the policies of the Communist Party. They had barely survived Mao’s campaigns, and they were desperate to live quietly, with as much prosperity as fate would allow. Chen grew up under different circumstances. In the late 1970s, after the Cultural Revolution, China turned its focus to economic development, and Chen’s generation grew up largely spared the cycles of mass mania that had traumatized his parents. His brothers didn’t seem to mind that he couldn’t see, and they enlisted him in village mischief: trapping animals, climbing trees, building dangerous toys and tools. When he was fourteen, he made a pistol out of bicycle parts and gunpowder, and accidentally shot himself in the leg.
If adventure gave Chen confidence that his body was not destiny, another theme—cruelty—stirred in him a sense of righteous anger. When other children entertained themselves by hitting him and running away, he writes about one of them, “I waited for the kid to strike again; when I heard him coming, I would grab him and throttle him back.” He did not blame the children; he blamed the adults who did not intervene. As he puts it, “these people seemed unconcerned with how I might feel and saw no problem with the way I was treated.” When the village acquired its first television, he squeezed into the crowd to experience it, and others said that his seat should go to a person who could see. “But this was blatant prejudice,” he writes, “and at the time I had no way of entering into a dialogue with people about it. The only thing I knew to do was to remain silent.”
Several of the most revealing sections of The Barefoot Lawyer are offhand observations about life with a disability in a rural village. At one point during his escape, Chen made sure to avoid being spotted by a neighbor’s mentally ill son who lived behind bars in a nearby yard. “He had been locked up that way for as long as I could remember, and he bayed from morning until night for his mother,” Chen writes, with a bluntness that suggests not a lack of sympathy, but a sense that life is cruel.
As he became older, his blindness not only limited his prospects but also became the source of an alternative understanding of the world. He was not allowed to attend the local school, so his father read to him from China’s classics—full of heroic bandits, noble sages, and unjust rulers. “Though I lacked the conventional education of my peers, I also avoided the propaganda,” Chen writes. For centuries, China had relied on rituals, models, and institutions to control wayward ideas, a process that the philosopher Xunzi, in the third century BC, compared to steam and pressure straightening a warped slab of wood. But Chen was excluded from many activities, so instead of the Party-approved curriculum, “my father’s tales became my foundational texts in everything from morality to history and literature.” Later, he received a radio, which exposed him to a vast range of programming—including uncensored reports from Hong Kong and Taiwan—that his peers rarely encountered.
When he was eighteen, Chen was finally allowed to go to school; he learned braille and emerged as an inveterate reformer. In his first year, he became a student representative and pushed administrators to provide more water to the dormitories for showers; he went on to demand the right to leave campus independently, and more funding for the music program. Outside of school, he developed an interest in the law and forced bus companies to observe rules allowing the disabled to ride for free. His activism sprang not from an abstract political agenda but from his certainty that life should be better. When a factory polluted the river near his village, Chen organized the installation of a safe water supply. The mayor urged Chen to speak, and he offered a single sentence: “I hope we can all achieve a better standard of living!”
In the next decade, however, Chen’s activism carried him beyond an amicable relationship with his government. He launched a much-publicized campaign to stop local officials from conducting forced abortions and sterilizations under the one-child policy. His motivation was partly personal: “Both my brother and his wife were forcibly sterilized,” he writes, and Chen and his wife were expecting a second child. The fear that they, too, might be assaulted radicalized him. Chinese law allowed self-taught “barefoot lawyers” to bring cases before the courts, and Chen filed class-action lawsuits that attracted growing concern from the Communist Party, which is acutely wary of organized political action. He writes, “I had no degree or law license to take away and, thus, had less to fear—or so I thought.”
We're excited about our new poster!
We're excited to be playing CAAMFest. Join us at one of our two screenings in March.
A timely exploration into the complex links between the U.S. and China, Vanessa Hope’s documentary feature debut evokes the personal and the international with its accent on diplomacy, activism and individual experience. Interspersed with remarks from journalists and experts, ALL EYES AND EARS interweaves the stories of U.S. Ambassador to China Jon Huntsman, his adopted Chinese daughter, Gracie Mei, and blind legal advocate Chen Guangcheng as they find purpose, identity and resolve amid the two nations’ evolving relationship.
The film follows Huntsman and his family during his tenure as ambassador. As he contends with achieving diplomatic goals in balance with the two countries’ interests in national security and economic growth, teenager Gracie gathers a more intimate understanding of her own cross-cultural identity. Meanwhile, Hope traces Chen Guangcheng’s journey — from being under house arrest to his highly publicized asylum at the U.S. Embassy — highlighting the activist’s thoughts on China’s ambitions as an emergent world power. ALL EYES AND EARS adroitly illuminates the delicate, intersecting layers of history, ideology and politics at play behind current diplomatic maneuvers.
Governments may want us to see no evil, hear no evil and speak no evil, but we are all eyes and ears and sometimes, some of us, find our voice.
"The element of self-deception in China’s attempt to control information has always invited mocking skepticism. In 2000 President Bill Clinton famously compared Chinese Internet censorship to “trying to nail Jell-O to the wall.” But as the ensuing years have proved, Chinese censors’ commitment to this seemingly hopeless enterprise has created a dire reality that imprisons each of its citizens."
Read 'China Sharpens Its Censorship Blade', a thought-provoking New York Times article about censorship in China, by Helen Gao.
We’re looking for people eager to learn about social media and crowd funding campaigns, and willing to meet the producer at the Film House, 644 Broadway in San Francisco, on a part-time schedule to help us launch.
We’re currently building out our website, Facebook page and Twitter feeds for the feature film and the twenty short docs we’re completing. We’re cutting trailers for the crowd funding and for the feature. We’re in sound mix and color correction on the feature which are really interesting parts of the post production process. We’re willing to open up all of these exciting parts of the filmmaking process to anyone interested in helping us out.
We’ve also got our festival run coming soon and will need intern help before, during and after the festivals. While it’s unpaid, the internship should be a great learning experience and opportunity to meet and collaborate with good people.
- college level education (in process or recently completed)
- interest in film
- interest in social media and crowd funding campaigns